@inproceedings{Schumann:1996:AEN,
opteditor = {},
optcitations =
{Lansdown:1995:ERR,Salisbury:1994:IPI,Schofield:1994:NPR,Bakergem:1991:FHP,Strothotte:1994:HRF,Winkenbach:1994:CGP},
optnote = {},
author = {Jutta Schumann and Thomas Strothotte and Andreas Raab and Stefan
Laser},
optkey = {},
optseries = {},
url = {http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi96/proceedings/papers/Schumann/chi96fi.html},
address = {New York},
localfile = {papers/Schumann.1996.AEN.pdf},
optpublisher = {ACM Press},
organization = {ACM SIGCHI},
doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/238386.238398},
optmonth = {},
optcrossref = {},
booktitle = {Proceedings of {CHI}'96 Conference on Human Factors in Computing
Systems (Vancouver, Canada, apr 1996)},
optstatus = {OK},
optvolume = {},
optnumber = {},
title = {{A}ssessing the {E}ffect of {N}on-Photorealistic {R}endered {I}mages
in {CAD}},
abstract = {Recent work in computer graphics has resulted in new techniques
for rendering so-called non-photorealistic images. While such
features are now already appearing in commercially available
software, little is known about the effect of non-photorealistic
images on users and their usefulness in specific contexts. In this
paper we report on an empirical study with 54 architects who
compared the output of a sketch-renderer for producing pencil-like
drawings with standard output of CAD systems for architectural
designs. The results show that the different kinds of renditions
actually have a very different effect on viewers and that
non-photorealistic images actually do deserve their place in the
repertoire of CAD systems.},
year = {1996},
pages = {35--42},
}
|